{"id":553,"date":"2014-10-30T10:16:52","date_gmt":"2014-10-30T09:16:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.abnormaldistribution.org\/?p=553"},"modified":"2014-10-30T10:16:52","modified_gmt":"2014-10-30T09:16:52","slug":"quantitative-easing-and-helicopter-money","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/2014\/10\/30\/quantitative-easing-and-helicopter-money\/","title":{"rendered":"Quantitative Easing and Helicopter Money"},"content":{"rendered":"

The US Federal Reserve Bank is to end its programme of quantitative easing (QE)<\/a>. QE was introduced by former chairman Bernanke as a response to the financial crash starting in 2008 (or 2007, or whenever). A colleague asked me a few years ago if I understood QE. <\/p>\n

I didn\u2019t. Now I (am under the illusion that I think I) do. <\/p>\n

I am prompted to write about it because last week I came across a startlingly readable book by British-educated economist Roger E. A. Farmer, who is at UCLA and still advises the Bank of England as well as various branches of the U.S. Federal Reserve. He won the inaugural 2013 Allais prize, with coauthors Carine Nourry and Alain Venditti of the Universit\u00e9 Aix-Marseilles for a paper on why financial markets don\u2019t work well in the real world<\/a>. Maurice Allais won the 1988 Nobel Memorial Prize, and is most well known for his paradox<\/a>. He was at the Ecole des Mines in Paris, whence in an earlier era the great mathematician Henri Poincar\u00e9 entered on his program to synchronise the world\u2019s clocks (Peter Galison, Einstein\u2019s Clocks, Poincar\u00e9\u2019s Maps, W. W. Norton, 2003<\/i>).<\/p>\n

Where was I? Roger E. A. Farmer, How the Economy Works, Oxford University Press, 2014<\/i>. <\/p>\n

The point of QE is as follows. Central banks such as the Fed and BoE traditionally attempt to regulate the rate of inflation in the economy by buying three-month government bonds in the market. The price they are prepared to pay says what they intend overall prices to do in the next three months. But suppose the interest rate, as given by government bonds, is 0, or very close to 0 . Who\u2019d care about selling bonds to the Fed or BoE? It takes somebody some work (keys have to be pushed on computer terminals and so on) for no gain at all. <\/p>\n

So maybe there\u2019s something else to be bought which could influence economic activity? Say, long-term government bonds, and commercial paper. The centrals buy it from banks which hold it. That’s QE. Commercial paper is short-term bonds issued by companies rather than government. Now, the central bank doesn\u2019t actually have to cash in that paper, and neither did the banks which previously held it. But if your paper is held by the BoE rather than, say, Lehmann Brothers, you as a company have a little more security that no one is going to come after your money soon. In other words, your loan has become a retrospective government grant. And the banks which held all those long-term bonds get to cash them out right away \u2013 long-term has become short-term. (They could always do that on the markets, but on worse terms; the central bank is working by fiat.)<\/p>\n

So, obviously, under QE more cash gets injected into the economy. It\u2019s called \u201cliquidity\u201d (liquidity is stuff which can be moved around the economy quickly. Like cash. People judge the health of economies by the \u201cvelocity of money\u201d and it\u2019s publicly measured by, for example, the St. Louis Fed<\/a>). There was a big discussion whether the 2008 crisis was caused by illiquidity or insolvency. Michael Lewis proposed a third possible factor: greed. This was so obviously right that nobody argued. (Greed, BTW, is not a concept that you find in most economics textbooks. Adam Smith is said to have shown that \u201cgreed is good\u201d and it thereafter disappeared from the vocabulary of \u201cserious\u201d economics, or so Wall Street would have us believe. Not all of us agree with that, especially after 2008.) Anyway, this placates the illiquidity proponents, leaving the legal system and courts free to deal with the insolvency bit (um, did that happen? Oh, I forgot: \u201ctoo big to fail\u201d. That\u2019s all right then). <\/p>\n

The big idea is that \u201cthe people who know where the money should go\u201d, namely the banks which sold their paper and long-term bonds to the central bank, are then giving it away to those who need it for good purpose. Say, British manufacturers. So British manufacturing should have been on the up and up. Well, it\u2019s a bit up, I understand. So who did go on the up and up? The London housing market in particular and the British housing market in general. Well, duh, isn\u2019t that where we came in? <\/p>\n

There is a short article in The Guardian today<\/a> by one of their economics commentators, Larry Elliot. Elliot compares QE with a mooted alternative, \u201chelicopter money\u201d. That\u2019s Milton Friedman\u2019s idea that you could fly helicopters over the country and drop money from them. Or, more soberly, as Farmer says (I think it\u2019s somewhere in his book), the central bank writes a check for \u00a32,700 to every man, woman, androgyne and child in the country. The idea is they go spend it where they want and thereby demonstrate true demand, which has been thwarted or at least distorted by the crisis. As we might guess, everyone will go out and buy undersea cables, high-performance aircraft engines, and the occasional bit of railway signalling and new track, won\u2019t they? It would be just toooo Victorian to imagine it\u2019ll go on drugs, sex and booze, but if it does, the British government might not be quite so furious at the consequences of sex and drugs now being included in the national accounts<\/a>. <\/p>\n

Actually, provided that Vodaphone can in the future find a way around charging people \u00a315,000 for an evening\u2019s phone \u201cusage\u201d<\/a>, it might well be spent on telecommunications and digital entertainment, that is, demand-attentive networks<\/a> and the iTunes store. Yes, those phones and tablets are made elsewhere, and (not-)taxed in Ireland, but they all use ARM chip designs from Cambridge<\/a>. So the British public wins: sex, drugs AND rock n’ roll, all now in the national accounts! <\/p>\n

You see, I do understand QE. Don\u2019t I? I suppose you\u2019re thinking \u201che\u2019s being silly\u201d. But go a little further. If you suppose \u201che\u2019s being silly, but come to think of it nobody can really do much better\u201d, I could imagine you have thereby deemed me An Economist!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The US Federal Reserve Bank is to end its programme of quantitative easing (QE). QE was introduced by former chairman Bernanke as a response to the financial crash starting in 2008 (or 2007, or whenever). A colleague asked me a few years ago if I understood QE. I didn\u2019t. Now I (am under the illusion […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/553"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=553"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/553\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abnormaldistribution.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}